Gerade entdeckt:
Been using N scale for a while, but my eyes are not getting younger. So I made a decision: Make my N-scale ambitions lesser. A 150 x 75 cm scenario that is easy to remove from my kitchen bench and put away when I need to. R1 is forbidden, I use minimum R2 (because of my steam locos), and long passenger coaches is also forbidden. Going to sell it all, and keep the short stuff.
So I plunged back into H0 scale. Right now my living room is only for me, as I have a Rocoline 4,5m x 1,8m track system on the floor. Minimum R9. Two NMJ trains at traffic there for the time being. I'm planning systems with Anyrail, and will do everyting to get it all upp from the floor, and along walls instead. I cannot do this where I live now - but I can learn and plan for the future.
My first purchase was this Paradepferd, the new Trix BR 103-152-5. 750 grams of heavy locomotive. From the 60's and up, I have ridden many trains pulled by this one, in all colours you can think of.
So N or H0? - both, please.
So N or H0? Having both is more expensive. I have a large HO scale layout. Without saying I regret it (because I have everything in fully digital Märklin), I often think I should have chosen N scale. I have all the digital BR 103s with a minimum of 16 functions (including the 150th anniversary one with 32 functions). 
With HO scale, you can limit yourself to one manufacturer. I've stuck with 90% Märklin and 10% Roco with a Central Station 3. For N scale, I find there's less documentation and no 3-rail solution, which prevents reversing loops.
