"A model, type, or standard to which all products and processes, activities, and services of the same series must conform, or to which they must comply".
But TSW, as you can see, lacks this. ![]()
"A model, type, or standard to which all products and processes, activities, and services of the same series must conform, or to which they must comply".
But TSW, as you can see, lacks this. ![]()
We're talking about a commercial product.
While it's fair to acknowledge the commitment, passion, and expertise of some developers (and it shows, the work is remarkable), if the end result doesn't meet the product's standards (assuming DTG is still capable of delivering them), the risk is that the end user won't understand it.
Now this whole community-based volunteer thing is getting ridiculous.
Are we still talking about a paid product (not exactly cheap, by the way) like TSW has always been or about modding?
What does it matter to me if a developer didn't sleep for seven nights to finish a job?
If I pay, I expect the final product to comply with the TSW6 standard.
Otherwise, I won't buy it.
Of course, the biggest blame for this lies with the Captain (DTG), who abandoned ship and left the crew to navigate by sight.
... Community Projekt ...
But for a fee, after all.
Length aside, they could at least do it right.
If even the Executive Producer admits it...
[user='11808']
Ich bin daher sehr gespannt, was am 25. so vorgestellt wird.
Gruß, BR480
Ich auch.
Excerpt from the DTG Forum (from page 5).
Just to give you an idea of the level of excitement we've reached.
Amateurs works mingle with professionals, and the end user is no longer sure what they'll find in the DLC.
(Of course I'll get slaughtered for this. Never mind.).
Und was hätten die Entwickler sonst machen sollen? Einen anderen BR 442 nehmen, der noch weniger passt? Gar kein Layer?
Read Sun_King_135's post... ![]()
From last night's stream.
Positive:
-the ICE upgrade is well done
-the speed at 300 km/h is good sensation
-the Nürnberg Express is also beautiful (it's unclear whether the rest of the train has active suspension like the driving coach).
Negative:
-the route is boring
-poor-quality buildings (always the same ones)
-bushes pop in near the tracks (a chronic TSW defect). It's nauseating.
-empty stations.
-announcements missing?
-the choice of SKA's BR 442 is "horror".
I certainly won't load my SSD with a path like SKA just for BR 442. Absolutely not.
Anyway, I wish you great success.
Many will enjoy this DLC. ![]()
Hi.
I'm referring to the low-resolution textures typical of TSW in the shade.
Obviously, this has nothing to do with TSG, but rather with UE4.
Furthermore, if from what I understand, the BR 442 train comes from SKA, it doesn't even have active suspension, so obsolete.
The usual low-resolution textures and completely outdated train layers (such as BR 442).
No thanks.
I just saw on YouTube that one of the topics covered in the August "Direct" will be the development of Sodor.
That's okay, but hopefully this isn't the only exciting news DTG is reporting... ![]()
Traditionally, DTG has an uncanny ability to leave users speechless (literally).
And then if the projects are good (GAS, Nurnberg, Folezz...) they end up in pay ware... ![]()
Probably because, as KAMUI said in his post, the path was made taking into account the expectations for older versions, such as TSW 3-4.
A problem with DLCs that take too long to be released.
I don't understand the eager anticipation some have for this DLC.
I don't see anything particularly captivating about it. ![]()
Sorry if I didn't express myself clearly.
I also meant to say that TSW won't be switching to any other graphics engine (because that's impossible).
Just like you, I was referring to a hypothetical successor (which, by the way, could very well coexist alongside the current TSW).
It will be years before any game developers start using UE6 (at least 2-3).
So TSW will remain as it is for years to come (meaning that there will be no alternative).
TSW certainly won't have UE5 or another graphics engine.
But "Direct" could represent an opportunity to look further ahead.
Otherwise, in the absence of future prospects, the fact that the current program could be maintained as is for many more "years", could cause DTG to shoot itself in the foot...
The fact that DTG has essentially disappeared (over the past year) as an add-on developer and that the MR project has failed might suggest that the August 25th announcement is based on something else entirely.
Of course, Tsw7 (or whatever it's called) will also be relevant, as several add-ons have already been announced previously.
The possibility that the "Direct" is about to follow the pattern of past years (i.e., DTG developing three routes and three trains) seems a bit suspicious to me.
Although, truth be told, DTG has an innate ability to build suspense and, immediately after, an equally adept ability to surprise with stunning announcements (in a weak sense, I mean).
Are you kidding me?
Or is your mind unable to process factual information?
Did you notice that there are two orange underlines in the image?
It's not a question of being obsessed or not.
Is it a lie or not?
Answer this question.