So the blurs (which cost half as much) are fine.
Beiträge von fabrizio520
-
-
If the product is blurry or seriously poor on consoles, the real fools are the people who keep buying the DLC.
How many times do you want to get your money stolen and then complain about the flaws?
Just forget it.
It's not a constitutional obligation.
Sorry for the crudeness, but getting screwed once is enough for me.
The second time, I get smart.
-
Very well done route.
-
... ist er vielleicht schon nicht mehr kompatibel..

This is a fact.
Certainly, the lack of some trains in the TSW, such as the ICE 2, the IC2 (which could certainly have been added in Leipzig), the ICE 4, the BR 151, and many others, is a bit suspicious.
I have the impression (but perhaps I digress) that this could be DTG's attempt to secure some "exclusive" rights for TS3.
I'm not convinced TS3 is that far off.
I'm not saying these missing trains will never be developed for TSW, but they could be released later (assuming TSW and TS3 run in parallel).
-
"Finally, we previously stated that gaps would be left to accommodate the future release of the BR 420 Add-on, by TSG. Further details about this release, including impact on timetables for route Add-ons, will be given over the course of future Roadmaps or closer to release.
In the meantime, we can confirm that the BR 423 from Frankfurt S-Bahn will occupy these services instead".
-Users=Willy Coyote
-BR 420=Beep Beep.
It always seems around the corner, but...
-
So, if you're still evaluating new rolling stock, there's no point in posting screenshots that have filled the forums with doubts.
Furthermore, usually (I hope this isn't the case) when a route is presented, it retains exactly those characteristics.
Anyway, good luck, guys.

-
Gleichzeitig sollte man erwähnen, dass er bereits Inhalte wie den Desiro HC und den ICE Neo in Arbeit hatte, ganz ausschließen würde ich da also nichts. Vielleicht nicht bei dieser Strecke aber bei der nächsten?
I've said it before.
It's not that users expect 3-4 new trains on every route, but at least a couple of new freight cars seems like the minimum.
It seems like they're doing it on purpose to make people nervous.
Unfortunately, TSW isn't like TSC, where you can buy rolling stock "individually."
If developers don't include them in the routes, it's impossible to achieve greater variety.
Anyway, we'll see.
Maybe we'll reconsider.
-
TSW and the routes mania...
-
More than the houses, I'm interested in knowing if there is any new freight rolling stock (since the article specifically talks about freight movement).
-
Rhine-Niers-Bahn line coming soon, according to DTG.
Source:Discord.
-
BR 420 is like the horizon: I walk two steps, and it moves two steps away.
I walk ten steps, and it moves ten steps away.
-
The routes should be well-designed and then "worked on," adding various rolling stock or other features.
I've always wondered why everyone in TSW (even amateur projects that will probably never see the light of day) is obsessed with designing (or attempting to design) routes and more routes.
No one ever thinks about building rolling stock.

-
At least for the English, they've released several DLCs for the freight cars.
For Germany, none.
The only ones are the GBS , which, however, were made rather cheaply.
Even in the TS, the GBS have opening doors and an interior.
In the TSW, they don't.

To get the RMMS freight wagons from the Mittenvaldbahn (a route I really don't like), my SSD needs 12gb of data.
TSW is really starting to get on my nerves.
-
Game Update - Train Sim World 6 Game Update - 13th November 2025Hello everyone, We're pushing live our next core update today, bringing a range of improvements across core routes and locos, as well as additional...forums.dovetailgames.com -
Es geht ja auch um eine zukunftsweisende Entwicklung als Softwaretitel.
That's the point

-
Sie machen immer wieder "Werbung" damit, Ein paar neue Lichteffekte? Trotzdem und wahrscheinlich noch ruckeliger Content als schon bei TSW6 (UE5 ist nunmal deutlich hungriger)? Eine BR 185 in UE5? Ein Multiplayer? Wieder so viel neues Geld ausgeben, nur um am Ende nach Jahren die selbe Anzahl an Fahrzeugen wie heute zu haben? Der grafische Schritt nach vorne, vor allem in Bezug auf die Fahrzeuge, kann und wird nicht so gravierend sein, als dass sich das wirklich lohnen würde.
I think exactly the same thing.
I don't want them to rely too much on multiplayer or for MR to truly be the foundation of a new simulator (even if it hasn't been released yet, the NYC subway guidelines are more than clear).
Another thing I agree with is that the rolling stock models in TSW have always been (at least aesthetically) very well done.
Rapid Transit's gray 1442 is still visually stunning.
I don't think they can improve the look of the trains much more.
The only alternative is that they could invent some continuity with what TSW offers now, but how?
-
TSW won't end overnight.
It will continue in parallel.
-
Eine weitere Zeit in die UE5 zu investieren bricht denen das Genick.
From UE4 to UE5 is not like going from UE to Unity, for example.
UE 5 is an evolution of the previous engine.
No learning from scratch is required.
The UE 5 interface is much more intuitive.
-
If it took 16 months from fishing to TSW (and therefore from kuiju to Unreal 4), the "risk" is that the time to go from UE 4 to UE 5 might be shorter.
(Now I'm interpreting).
-
DTG has been making this known for some time now.
And it's not just a matter of interpretation.
Watch MR's stream (towards the end).