Beiträge von fabrizio520

Neckartalbahn Rolling Stock.

Technically, the E.464 is classified as a single-cab locomotive, as it features only one full-fledged, elevated driving cab at one end.

However, the opposite end—the flat end featuring the gangway door—is not entirely featureless.

Auxiliary control position:

at the rear, there is a small window with an auxiliary control console installed in front of it, complete with a windshield and wiper.

Usage and limitations:

this reduced control station is used by staff solely for shunting maneuvers in reverse or for short movements within depots and stations.

For safety and visibility reasons, the maximum speed allowed when operating from this auxiliary console is strictly limited to 30 km/h.

The space surrounding this rear station was originally designed to accommodate luggage or bicycles, which is why the rear area differs completely from a standard cab.

When the train needs to travel at normal speed in that direction, the locomotive is not driven from the rear but is remotely controlled from the driving trailer located at the other end of the trainset.

So, no.

The rear cabin is not used as a luggage compartment or for transporting bicycles.

Locomotive E464 540 in the new Regional Livery (decidedly better-looking than the ill-conceived XMPR livery).

Cuneo (Italy), October 4, 2026.

I'd say that at 1:09 the difference from before is quite noticeable.

It was precisely in the shadowed areas on the tracks that the textures were particularly flat.

Let's see if that's actually the case...

Zitat von Traindori

fizzbin

Liegt das evtl daran, dass das Projekt ehemals eine Community-Strecke war?

Yes, exactly.

However, certain "truths" irritate some users.

Free Starter Edition

Returning Players

"If you’ve been playing prior Train Sim World games, it’s likely you have already amassed a collection of compatible add-ons. Getting the Free Starter Edition allows you to continue playing with any add-ons purchased on the same platform and account. This means you can benefit from the latest updates and be able to purchase the latest Train Sim World 7 compatible add-ons".

I will also take this + ICE 4.

As for Nurnberg - Wurzburg I will wait for ICE 1 to be updated to tsw7 standards (always assuming they do...).

Otherwise they can keep it, as far as I'm concerned.

Here's a video showing the graphical differences between Tsw6 and Tsw7 "Epic."

Not bad...

In fact, it's downright fantastic, I'd say.

I wouldn't have expected this.

A mod isn't like a feature integrated into the core like this.

Even if it's ultimately Jat Wash's (they finally recruited him too).

Another issue that leaves me with some doubts is the implementation of the ICE 1 on the Nürnberg-Würzburg route.

I doubt it has been updated with active suspension and that it is on the same lines as Ingolstadt with the BR 101.

In that case I won't buy it.

Edit:

more on graphical improvements is coming tomorrow.

The graphical improvements were "dismissed" a bit quickly in the Direct.

The only way to test this new feature is to try the free version of TSW7.

Personally, I don't trust them much anymore.

Does Directx 12, dlss, fsr4 actually improve areas without direct sunlight (basically eliminate flat textures), in any way?

All very "original", I must say.

No migration.

TSW6 will stay as it is (and the following ones).

I'm talking about other things.

For a user familiar with Unreal Engine 4, the transition to Unreal Engine 5 takes a few days to a couple of weeks for basic adaptation, and about 1-2 months to master the new advanced technologies like Nanite and Lumen.

Even the interface and flow of the core components (Blueprint, C++, asset management) are virtually identical to UE4.

The programming logic and project structure remain familiar from day one.

However, in my opinion, Peddlesten and DTG are missing the point.

Ouch, ouch...

A celebration of TSW's 10th anniversary?

You might be right.

And maybe some news about Sodor.

Yes, that's the policy.

Gross errors (as reported on the DTG forum and here) and now those who purchased the addon (for €36.00) are waiting for a patch, with no specific date (weeks, months?).

It's a shame that TSW has come to this miserable end.

Zitat von Cirno

Machen wir nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen. Manchmal ist aber halt ein edgecase, an den man einfach nie gedacht hat dann fehlerhaft. Ein komplett fehlerfreies Produkt zu veröffentlichen ist quasi Glückssache

Yes, it's true.

Those who work hard can make mistakes.

But releasing accessories (like the BR 145's missing suspension, originally) without certain features is a choice.

It's not their fault.

When an Executive Producer thinks this way...

I'm sorry if this came across as arrogant.

Sometimes it's difficult to convey true feelings through a forum post.

I just wanted to point out that the end user doesn't care how a product was made.

There are difficulties in every job.

Then again, I repeat, we're talking about a full-price commercial product.

I've never asked for anything for free.

Again, I'm sorry if I seemed rude.

Good day everyone.

For example, this one.

It's not a "standard" because it's not a fully implemented feature.

A user reading this expects uniformity.

Or is this intentional (or to be malicious)?