Beiträge von fabrizio520

And then if the projects are good (GAS, Nurnberg, Folezz...) they end up in pay ware...

Probably because, as KAMUI said in his post, the path was made taking into account the expectations for older versions, such as TSW 3-4.

A problem with DLCs that take too long to be released.

I don't understand the eager anticipation some have for this DLC.

I don't see anything particularly captivating about it.

Sorry if I didn't express myself clearly.

I also meant to say that TSW won't be switching to any other graphics engine (because that's impossible).

Just like you, I was referring to a hypothetical successor (which, by the way, could very well coexist alongside the current TSW).

It will be years before any game developers start using UE6 (at least 2-3).

So TSW will remain as it is for years to come (meaning that there will be no alternative).

TSW certainly won't have UE5 or another graphics engine.

But "Direct" could represent an opportunity to look further ahead.

Otherwise, in the absence of future prospects, the fact that the current program could be maintained as is for many more "years", could cause DTG to shoot itself in the foot...

The fact that DTG has essentially disappeared (over the past year) as an add-on developer and that the MR project has failed might suggest that the August 25th announcement is based on something else entirely.

Of course, Tsw7 (or whatever it's called) will also be relevant, as several add-ons have already been announced previously.

The possibility that the "Direct" is about to follow the pattern of past years (i.e., DTG developing three routes and three trains) seems a bit suspicious to me.

Although, truth be told, DTG has an innate ability to build suspense and, immediately after, an equally adept ability to surprise with stunning announcements (in a weak sense, I mean).

Are you kidding me?

Or is your mind unable to process factual information?

Did you notice that there are two orange underlines in the image?

It's not a question of being obsessed or not.

Is it a lie or not?

Answer this question.

False and liars.

Apparently, there's a return from the past here too.

BR 422...

Nürnberg - Ingolstadt?

Very, very fine.

An absolute masterpiece.

I could ride this nearly 120-ton monster all day with that bouncing front end...

10/10

A standard without realistic suspension?

Let's hope not.

The only thing that's never "reluctant" is the price.

It's always fair, even when things are done halfway.

If costs 10.00 euros more than "Assetto Corsa Rally" in Early Access.

Regarding the suspensions (which should also apply to the Czech Republic), Matt once said that whether they're implemented or not makes a big difference.

And I agree.

He also said that third parties, if they need technical assistance, can contact DTG directly.

What could this mean?

That DTG is completely out of TSW development?

Probably.

We'll see if DB 147 (from DTG) also has these shortcomings.

Furthermore, they were the ones who said that from TSW4 onwards this feature would be a "standard."

Someone should explain why the Maintalbahn Eaos have suspension and the Czech Eas don't.

They didn't want to install it, aren't they capable of doing so?

Now, who are we to believe?

It's like being in the local market...

Ultimately, nothing fundamental to my existence, but just to have a clearer picture.

Ok, it was just a service announcement...

For those interested in active suspension, the developer just posted on the DTG forum that the BR 145 locomotive will not be equipped with this feature either due to technical difficulties.

Unfortunately for me this is a shortcoming that completely compromises the immersion.

If you say so...

(You can tell you're an intelligent person).

Active suspension is only implemented on the main locomotives.

Freight cars don't have it.

It's just the usual poorly done job.

After all, it was said that from TSW4 onwards, this would be a must-have feature.

Watch out for scams, guys.

I'm not interested in this kind of mockery.