Beiträge von Norweger

I cannot drive to and from Ingolstadt without getting the message I need to install Munchen-Nurnberg, and after that the scenario is ended. I have contacted RSSLO about this, but I fear there is not much help to get in weekends. Is there something I can do to avoid this, or do I need a new serial?

PS, regarding replacing tracks with K-V tracks:

I just unzipped the Drautalbahn upgrade, renamed Assets/RSSLO Routes/ "Drautalbahn" to "Ingolstadt_Treuchtlingen" and copied the assets to Railworks. Made a backup of Railnetworks before I did this. With default greenery and K-V tracks I can safely say I'm happy.

In my opinion, SHG destroyed the sound on their 1144 with the latest update... my ears are bleeding when driving it. Is there a video somewhere I can listen to the new RWA loco before making a purchase?

EDIT:

Being known for not being the most patient person on earth... I found a video of the beta on Youtube, then made my purchase. Sound is great. Feels like and sound like the real-world locos I have been driving back in the 90's.

I finally found the problem with REX 1524, using the upgraded version of Salzburg-Schwarzach St. Veit, AI crash just before St. Johan in Pongau. Both problems were at at Bischofshofen. AI trains first crashed into a cargo consist, that seemed out of place as it was over a switch, so I deleted it. But got a new crash, this time a little closer to St. Johan. I observed that the AI now crashed in the Railjet consist at Bischhofshofen. So I moved that consist to the next track. Which finally made it start it's journey towards Salzburg, solving the problem permanently.

Did you make this scenario for the original scenery? I guess upgrading it with ØBB signals could make trouble then? Another theory I have is that on some computers, consists can "pop" into a track they are not supposed to be in. Would be interesting to hear your opinion of this, and if you want to do something to REX 1524, I can help with pics from Bischofshofen before and after fixing.

Great job on Kufstein-Brenner. With FSclips + your upgrade it has become close to perfect.

Nord Deutschland v2

Munster-Bremen

Hamburg-Hannover Deluxe (2019 version)

Hannover-Bremerhaven

Frankfurt-Koblenz v1.2

BR-218

Problem solved!

Please take note that I had the EZY package installed for the last 48 hours. And I think the problem was this: The vR Gleise included in your F-K v1.2 download are not the same size (Zipped) as the one you just linked to here. The files are also very different.

Looking good!

I'm sorry to bother you again. Been experimenting for days (and following the readme to the letter). But after leaving Flughafen Fernbahnhof richtung Koblenz, I get either no track or partly tracks in the first tunnels. As said before I can not use the default tracks because of other tunnel problems. Using vR tracks is what I like best, but noe tracks at all (see my pics). If I use EZY tracks it is better, but with ugly artefacts. I prefer to not use EZY tracks anyway, because of heavy moire effects seen from cab. Seems to be like the entire LZB line after leaving the airport is defective. This was OK for me a while back, but I cannot remember what was the optimal configuration at that time. I can easily live with with this. The rest of the line is first class, so I just have to avoid the Fernbahnhof.

Another thing: Found out using TS-Tools that I also had to install CMD Cornflakes zwergsignale.

No, right now I have just used Your ver 1.2 zip on a fresh F-K original (without unzipping the original assets). Give me a few minutes to install MJ's ICE 1 scenario and we'll see how it goes this time.

EDIT:

Using Maltes fine ICE 925 (for the original F-K) - I got tunnels in wrong places right after leaving Koblenz. Replacing the original tracks with Your included vR Tracks option solved it. It seems the tunnels don't like those original tracks. Now I just have to make the weather AP before I vomit

Oh and thx a lot for making this gem.

Yes, it says there may be problems on the original route (which I do not use anyway) - but does not explain why I sometimes get tunnels all over the place in Your F-K 1.2.

Forgive me if I'm blind... but your readme does not mention the tunnel problem. Which also reminds me I may have been wrong in my previous post, I think I solved it by chosing other tracks. Dumb thing is I both unzipped the F-K assets and replaced tracks at the same time :-p

I am about to soon install Your F-K again, and I will try to pinpoint what exactly solved my tunnel problem and report back this time.

I solved the tunnels problem by unzipping the Frankfurt-Koblenz assets, and then installed the V1 again.

Kim and FortyCS -

I go with you both. But as being born as a perfectionist, and seeing in real-life since the 60's MAERSK and never MAERS when being on trains from Oslo via Sweden, Puttgarden, all the ferries and from there (sometimes via Kiel) and other times via Hamburg Altona... I never saw a "MAERS".

You have to understand I'm also a sailor and been all around the world, and I cannot remember ONE instance I ever saw "MAERS". I thank you for trying to dampening my rage, but I will stubbornly remove all MAERS from my TS in all future because I never saw that in reality. And tomorrow I have dog dig into RSBinTool.

I can live with that, as I only use Koblenz-Trier Reloaded and custom-made Aufgaben.

Thank you - that explains it to a certain degree. Been mad about this for a long time - and I think 3dZug could have explained this to me - as I have asked them a long time, but not much answers to get! Anyway then I can stop being mad and simply replace those.

But I have to add - if 3dZug can't make those correctly, they should not make them at all.

Would anyone be so kind to explain to me why all the (supposed to be) MAERSK sggnss are labeled "MAERS" in the 3dZug KI Pack 1? This seem to never be fixed. And I hate to have to replace Sggnss_beladen and Sggnss40Ft3 all the time with RD's correct repaints

I'm supposed to post a pic when answering, so here it is. Nord Deutscland v1 and beta was a bit "naked" regarding trees and stuff, and the trees was popping in and out. Now it is nice and lush all the way, a LOT more greenery - just try to drive over the Rendsburg bridge again

Kim-

Yes I will do that exactly (again). I do not need to remove the one after Spittal, as I have learnt to get down to 85 km/h and acknowledge (on green) - this is also a way to solve it. Important thing is to write this up in my TS Tips notepad doc

A couple of shots from Nord Deutschland v2 - driving the classic 103. Aufgabe is from BLXT, "IC 524 Hanseat". I really enjoy the 103 cab view in autumn evening sun. Nord Deutscland v2 is a lot more detailed than before. I took myself the liberty of using mint instead of blau-beige, because I simply enjoyed that epoch very much real-life.

Tobi,

I know Tauernbahn V2 needs an upgrade. I have one, but it is not to download anymore. Fixes the vegetation and introduces DB-Tracks. What I hope for is to get rid of two sharp (1000 Hz?) PZB magnets that ruins it all. Shortly after leaving Spittal, I have to get down to 85 km/h and acknowledge in order to not get a zwangse. It is the same before entering the first station after Schwarzach St. Veit... zwangse. I cannot believe this is not reported before to the maker. Tauernbahn needs a signal and PZB upgrade.

Oh, and thanks for all your other RSLLO upgrades... love them!

Recently caught one of the new OnRail locos at Snartemo.