Jede Strecke für den TS ist eine Bereicherung.
Meine Meining auch.
Jede Strecke für den TS ist eine Bereicherung.
Meine Meining auch.
Kommt darauf an, wer davon teilnimmt?! Ist es die neue Gruppe aus Dänemark, könnte ich mir das durchaus vorstellen. Bei der alten Gruppe bin ich mir da nicht sicher.
My guess is that it wont be the “new folks”.
Das ist natürlich bitter und "betrieblich" leider nicht wirklich sinnvoll.
Sehr sehr schade und dämpft die Vorfreude tatsächlich etwas.
Come on. Loading a new route at Koblenz hbf hardly takes longer than picking passengers up anyway.
Und dann müssen noch die 33km von Offenburg nach Hausach gebaut werden und dann könnte man auch von Düsseldorf nach Konstanz fahren....
Und dann die etwas 30 km zwischen Konstanz und Rorschach.
Düsseldorf - Brenner (oder Saalfelden)
Der Nullpunkt der Strecke gehört zu Frankfurt-Karlsruhe. Verbindung mit Köln - Koblenz wird es nicht geben.
Do you know more details? Links Oder Rechts?
Well DTG just granted me one of my TS wishes. Closing yet a hole in the German TS network.
Give us:
Konstanz - Rorschach
Freiburg - Donaueschingen (will the new freeware Höllentalbahn cover this?)
and yet we have even more of the TS network connected.
I am prefectly fine with loading a new route at Koblenz hbf if i want to drive from Köln to Frankfurt. I, personally, don’t need the routes merged. It’ll only increase loading times.
I love that you put creative decisions to a vote ![]()
I, like most, voted for an update later that might include ZUB. I little thought. There are two different ZUB implementations in TS. The one from Rivet Games and the ZUB simulation in TrainworX trains. Ideally both should be included so you can run with train protection systems on both routes from B52rail and Rivet Games.
Autobuy!!!
Wonder if it will be the Rechte or Linke Rheinstrecke.
Linz richtung Salzburg.
Looking forward to it ![]()
Hi there. A little question. How much will SCMT be implemented?
I’ve said this before, but any route that will connect existing routes. (Not talking about extensions here). Example: A route that runs from Kufstein via Rosenheim to Salzburg.
Autobuy for me.
@Tilmann I think this route is via Rendsburg. So you can do freight from Pattburg to Rendsburg. And Passenger from Flensburg to Kiel.
Well well. I like getting the TS networks bigger. So when this one is out you can drive from Hannover to Flensburg. I wonder if it will include the Grenzbahnhof Pattburg.
Edit: Pattburg will be included.
Use the clone function . (Really it is a “save as” function.) Give the clones version numbers. That way you can always go back to the last functioning version instead of losing hours of work.
Save as, can save your ass ![]()
@bahnjan no need to make the route more resource heavy by including something you can’t see from the Führerstand.
@ben412 There is a difference between dtg routes. Some have better signalisation than others. But on Lübeck Kiel the signalisation is not only bad. It is broken. On routes like München Garmisch or Hamburg Hannover the signals are at least functioning.
I think the decisions that seems to have been made from DTG, that there are two different audiences for the two ganes make a lot of sense. And we will all benefit from it in the end.