I believe the update has arrived ...
(History).
https://steamdb.info/app/530070/
Beiträge von fabrizio520
-
-
BR Class 31 pro Leeds- Manchester
http://www.trainsim.cz/?mod=article&showid=2299&query= -
-
-
-
-
Without a doubt RAILSimDE regarding the TSW is, at this moment, the best forum for news, mods, links and expertise.
It is almost certainly, DTG often reads here (just use a translator ...).
-
-
Any response would have been better than the one he provided.
-
For example, some news on the state of development.
What do you think? -
Seems to do it on purpose to piss people off.
-
For information only (for those who do not attend the DTG forum).
In this discussion MattP talks about the editor.
In practice this year it does not even arrive with a letter to Santa Claus.
-
I think an update is coming, but it is not currently known.
(History).
https://steamdb.info/app/530070/ -
The locomotive is really fantastic.
Had it seemed to me that I had read somewhere that the big Falns doors could be opened?
I can not do it. -
This point of MattP. (from the DTG forum about next Class31) is interesting.
This could be (also) a cause of the release delay of the editor. In practice, not all routes are still optimized to the fullest.
Obviously it's my speculation."While the 31 is of course a great fit for the North Trans-Pennine route, it wouldn't slot in to many of the existing services at all (you can't sub a pair in for a single for example) and would need a new service layer to be constructed. There wasn't the opportunity to do that for this pack unfortunately. If the opportunity presents to add a 31 layer to the NTP pack then of course it's something that can be looked into.
There is also something heavy about the memory usage on the NTP route at the moment and until we have that isolated and resolved I'm wary about increasing the load on the route and potentially creating problems for people.
So - absolutely not saying that it doesn't fit, but that it specifically doesn't fit the specific services that are currently on the route bearing in mind substitution can only sub one vehicle for one vehicle, it can't change the formation. If we can add a new layer in the future, that would enable some interesting possibilities using the existing stock I think, but to be completely clear and transparent - that is not on a plan at the moment."
Matt.
-
The PCA two-axle wagons are also very beautiful, I must say.
-
Now can you actually list a source of that statement?
You know very well what I'm referring to. Try to find it yourself. You think you're funny, right?
Take a ride knocking on doors to ask for candy.
It's the right evening.
-
This is actually more precise. However the crux of the matter is that from April to now there has been no progress according to DTG.
Hard to believe. -
Give me the source and I'm happy. And please an explicit release date.
But are you kidding me?
-
In fact they are themselves the cause of discontent.
