SeKu Davide is Italian, so there will be some kind of language barrier, and cultural difference in expression as well.
When i first started posting here, the Höflichkeit took me a while to get, as we don’t do it quite the same way in Denmark either.
Beiträge von Kim_olesen1
-
-
RSSLO signals are usually really buggy
Nowhere near as buggy as dtg Köln S bahn or Lübeck Kiel. Most of the time RSSLO signals work just fine, particularly if you know how to work around their quirks when building scenarios.
-
tom87 If an extension from Donauwörth to Augsburg had Sk signals, i guess it would be worth it. Could be fun to have.
-
Real Drive ist geplant. I have already made for one for Ingolstadt Treuchtlingen, it just hasn’t been released yet.
-
Nice. Autobuy for me.
-
Well we already know that Nürnberg - Donauwörth is coming.
-
XinoTroN I simply forgot.
-
-
Well we have to be grateful for every new German route. Autobuy for me.
If it’s Augsburg Donauwörth, it would be interesting if it has Sk signals. I know they are being replaced as we speak, but i would like to have a route with them.
-
While i’m also tired of price discussions, mostly because it’s the same discussion everytime, ice is ofcourse correct. Price talk belongs in the thread of the DLC in question. I can just skip reading it, it’s not that hard.
-
Train Simulator is a copyrighted brand name, owned by DTG. So either it is just a project name, or if not, then it has to be a DTG project. Perhaps the company that DTG was recently sold to wants a TSC successor.
-
fizzbin Show me even one TSC user that would not pay for TSC v2 if it runs most legacy dlc, but also have cool new features and real optimizations.
-
It’s the thing with the Gesäusebahn that intrigues me. They’ve stated that it’s a TSC project. BUT there were things in the screens from them that made me ask them how they made that in TSC. Particularly they had REAL sattelite images on distant mountains (just like MSFS).
They did answer me that they found a way to make it possible in TSC.
But since no one ever did that before, already then i was wondering if they were in fact using a not yet released version of TSC.
Las uns sehen. Abwarten und Kaffee trinken.
-
I came upon this very interesting thread at the Railworks Austria forum. Read the replys from the admin.
https://railworks-austria.at/forum/index.php?thread/2277-taurus-1216-und-etcs/
Railworks Austria is developing for a new sim. Not TSW and not Zusi either. And since SimRail is not new either, that might not be it. So what could it realistically be? One thing i am finding increasingly strange is the ongoing silence from DTG after the beta strain of core updates. I am wondering if there is actually a TSC v2 coming. A version that will be able to load some (but not all) legacy dlc.
Why do i think this might be the case: The problem with the TSC core renewal was the “must not break any dlc” rule DTG set for themselves. But with a v2 of TSC they can break some DLC, and it will be up to developers to fix compabilities.
Why would DTG want to make a v2 of TSC? Because they were unable to do things with old tsc vore that would REALLY futureproof the core in terms of future computing (multicore, arm cpu architecture support etc…..)
Let’s see.
-
I’ve asked RSSLO about italian routes. And they even answered. There is too much work in creating new signal scripts, scripts for SCMT, italian infrastructure objects. Also getting correct info about signal placements etc is not possible.
I did reply that the Italian freeware scene would probably let them use their scripts for free.
-
No matter what route it is. I will buy it.
-
Are you using the latest beta version?
-
Iskult Ahh ich sehe. Danke.
-
I don’t quite get it. Has something changed with railworks.dk? I don’t remember any asset from there costing anything.
-
I wish DTG would not give up on TS.
