Raptor see developers with money trees in the gardens.
The price from this product is perfectly fine, the TSC market is declining in size , daily life become more expansive . So simple TSC become also more expansive, if developers are not allowed to ask a market price than nothing new will arrive anymore .
Ps: don’t complain about prices, we don’t life in year 2017 anymore. Years ago you pay for the same bread same quality also less than today.
Railtraction hat neue Waggons auf den Markt gebracht!
Jetzt ansehen unter www.railtraction.eu
Die Weihnachts-Ausverkaufsaktion von Christrains und Railtraction ist online bis zum 24. Dezember.
Der Tank selber ist schmutzig, das Gestell wie geleckt -fabrikneu ...sehr real.
Maybe you should buy it instead of watch 1 picture than you understand what is inside or look better to real images and product images.
For your information, it’s perfectly plausible that a dirty tank can sit on a clean wagon because it can be removed and placed on it, and wagons vice versa. Same like a rusty shipping container on a brand new wagon, also possible.
Von Railtraction gibt es für 6,85€
einen neuen Wagons
Railtraction hat gesagt, dass sie die Rocktainers bauen werden.
Gainmaster how do you compare two different wagons? Zacns 98 wagons from VR and RT are different wagon models. So it’s not a double production.
Auf Facebook: bis 24-02-2025
From today till 24-02-2025 we have selected addons in Sale. Visit our store to find out: https://www.railtraction.eu
Railtraction-Christrains. Christmas Sale bis 23 Dec 2024
This real wagons still reflect enough, even the dents on it reflect sunlight clear, if you look to the black paint it even reflect blue sky light, check this photos open the links and see detail photos near the blueprints.
My personal Opinion, I compromise with pleasure the little extra shine(visible cubic map) for visible dents than complete flat metal. We don’t have pbr pipeline here and sadly need that shine to show some dept with bumpmappings.. So if you like flat metal on this with les shine than fine. RT version is not wrong in my eyes. I think mixing VR and RT together will be a nice collection. By the way,RT use also Substance painter.
ice you recognise substance painter on the VR wagons because the default drag and drop dirt effects😁 , nothings special there, second I see that VR use a specenvmask and RT bump mapping, definitely more texture work in the RT wagons. Optical RT look more close to the real wagons with the dents in the metal.
Hi BR-218 i do not know if you made the Zs signals. im sorry if i missed this part of info.
but there is some trick to implement to make it all better , for this you need to do two things, at least if you export with the newer 3D max plugins(( if you use the old one than you can do it easy), for Blender i dont know, i dont use it, maybe you can give in blender the right condition straight before you export in your material settings. in the experimental dx12 version below doesn't work that great yet, i already reported this to DTG.
You need to give the texture shader instruction to render the texture under MipLinearMip, and this you do on the texture which give the glow,
Second is: edit the texture mip maps, open the texture and choose to open existing mip maps, take your paint brush and make light glows bigger(as example if the dot is 1 pixel make it 5 pixels bigger, on the end you will end in a square glow effect( no problem from far away you are not able to see if it is square or round. do not edit the first 2 biggest texture parts. all done?, save the existing mip maps. (you can edit the second but dont increase the glow so much or the glow become to fast to intens,
at the end you will see from large distance that the glow become bigger. DTG do this also on signals.
if you cant give the condition than you need to edit the model file in TS tools. i can instruct later when im home from work. Feel free to ask me if you need help.
No worry, i have it all ,NDA's are boss in our world.
Kim , where did you ever read ?? that i prefer Kuju trains or minimalistics or that there is no need for a proper PZB or LZB ? just tell me where i wrote that ? i only told: large part from the TSC market doesnt require full fletch systems, and i even didnt sayd what i prefer!.to make it clear i prefer proper systems, i like it and enjoy what people make. i respect that allot. Im more than 15+ years in the Game industry active now days, teach kids/ young adults Unity and Unreal Engine. i know how this markets work.
Well you are not completely disagree 
ChicagoExpress as i can see on your answer.
Mostly people will choose TSC for the visuals, and this is also the biggest part from the market, DTG doesnt drive on the advanced safety system fanatics(they are a smaller part from the total) otherwise they did it all different or they didnt exist anymore, Why so many people buy TSC addons which are not correct, because they dont know or they care about annother part, and the smaller part from this buy it and hope the freeware devs implement the amazing signals from schuster/ team which make things miles better, or completely rebuild large parts.
External developers provide the more advanced experiences or visual or internal with code work and they pleasing the people like you and me. ofcourse , the fanatics are there, you are right but im sure its not the biggest part.
As far as i know in the 10 + years Railtraction never promised advanced full complete systems where everything work exact on every point like the real train, the focus lay between, more than DTG offer and for the more fanatics extra things for a relative fair price. if the LZB from RT respond good im sure i will have a nice loco in my collection.
StefanDD my point is a little you make some impression here as developer that other developers dont programming correct (im sorry if i understand you wrong ), and that you are the only one which deliver the perfect safety systems(there are also things to discover or to add )no worry i like your work on the safety system, and i think they are good. but the PZB from RT is not that bad as some which make this impression. i get the same experience and expectable situations which is see in Zusi 3 or yours , atleast in my experience and driving time. and i really dont care how they program it.
If i need to care about my part (texturing / Unreal engine ) than i get a hard time in TSW.
little earlier you came by with your idee to mod the 185.2 with some sort of impression that this is better than a 146.5 . im sorry to say, what i see in the cabin visuals looks more appealing and sharper in the br146.5 than 185.2. and ofcourse the RT cab is more close to the real 146.5.
but no problem everybody is allowed to wish what they want, if that make them happy than fine, and im sure all this different views make things better. lucky we dont have to eat outside one box and we have freedom to choose our own wishes. I like to see multiple developers make there own trains, even if it is not perfect it deliver for sure other experiences , because every developer have own style of creating modelling etc which work also refreshing. If there was only one external developer i for sure put TSC / Railworks back in the box long ago and never open again. This remind me about something more offtopic, flightsimulator when i bought in the past 3 times te same airport from different developers, it work just refreshing.
