Beiträge von Kim_olesen1

It is a fine route. I am happy with my purchase. RSSLO get’s better with each release.

What i like about the new weather/season/time implementation is that you can choose what you want to have randomised. Much better than in TS where everything is randomised.

I’m in for all phases.

Just imagine if there is a Linz Wien route at some point. What an enormous Austrian/German network we would have.

Then imagine if the Rorschack Konstanz and Offenburg/Freiburg/Hausach got connected too.

alias203 ich gebe dich vollkommen Recht. That hole must be closed. Hausach Offenburg too, så we have a real big southwestern. Railnetwork. And if the last km between Rorschach and Konstanz were to be connected, we are talking Düsseldorf - Innsbruck - Linz - Nürnberg erc etc etv

Two small projects that could unite south german rails with the expansive Austrian railnet. And a bit of swizz too.

oldsnake three buttons for the most flexibility.

I will happily put in a good word for RWe2 at train sim uk.

oldsnake Would it be possible to make a “randomise time, season and weather” button?

Jogibär  oldsnake

Here is a solution that might be more elegant. I am making a comparison to the music program Logic Pro for explanation. Here you can hide audio tracks.

That could be used on routes, scenarios and even consists in quickdrive.

It would go like this. Have a little hide tickbox in the mentioned items. Have a master hide tickbox somewhere. When that box is ticked, all items marked hide is hidden. And when not, all items marked are shown.

That way we get much more user flexibility, than an auto-hide function.

oldsnake track lenght would be much preffered if possible. When driving mountain routes with bends and twisted valleys, it is really wierd to see the distance to a stop increasing.

@Pingu I have the TS Bahnübeegang bug on a good number of routes. Always give me a chock.

oldsnake Your servicemindedness is outstanding!

oldsnake at the moment i’m using TS shaders. I am only using the RWE2 HUD and PIS features right now.

Precedural flora has the same problem too.

tom87 I might try some UK content one day. But my heart is with the German/Swiss/Austrian content. It is an emotional attraction to these countries that i’ve felt since childhood. I don’t think anything from outside these will ever interest me. I have som UK routes that have come with TS updates, but i’ve never played them even once. Italian content would be of interrest to me.

There was also a containership in Passau Linz. Aber nicht aus Führerstand sichtbar. So i didn’t delete it. If i see one from the Führerstand, i will.

Adding to my previous post. And what would we be left with? TSW payware, and hundred TS freeware projects, where maybe 5% gets finished. (Not a disrespect to freeware developers, i think it is beyond fantastic that anyone sees a route to completion, it’s hard and tedious work).

Let’s see. What routebuilders that build German content are left? DTG, VirtualTracks and RSSLO. And ofcourse Vt builds wonderful stuff, but with two years between every release, that will not be enough to keep payware TS alive. Jan is also not building for a living and his preference for the time being is the Berlin sbahn net, of which he ofcourse makes a wonderful job. DTG release one german route a year (or maybe it’s closer to 1,5?). So without RSSLO we get about 1 main German route a year. Not enough to keep the simulator we all love alive.

Ok i know i put German/Austrian routes into the same basket, and perhaps it’s just because my interest is both countries. We can add Swiss routes. B42rail are the only ones left, and they do take their time too. So they do not count for a lot of content. Rivet Games are sadly gone from TS. But i seem to recall that the Gotthardbahn was 35€ too. And i do not think it was particularly prettier than RSSLO routes. RSSLO vegetation has at least become more varied. And their tracks are (imo) worse than RSSLO tracks.

Going to play the devils advocate here.

Everything gets more expensive. Software developers have to pay higher prices to live too. That a routebuilder should be locked to the same price as 5 years ago is a strange thought.

As to the Rübeland comparison. As Maik Goltz has stated. Even when building a high quality short route, the amount of work that goes into it, does not bring in enough to make a living. So to expect that 120km of route be cheaper and just as beautiful is an impossible expectation. And either we support the developers, or payware TS dies. It’s as simple as that. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. If there was good money in routebuilding long routes like Münster Bremen, then routes like that would still be made. But even when a high quality route is released, someone will argue over the price.

In two weeks, someone will have switched the tracks and vegetation and then everything is honky dory?

RSSLO signalisation is still far better than DTGs own.

V200.1 I don’t think so. I see no parameter for routes that a KI consist is enabled for.

So for now i think you still need ts_tools for that.

oldsnake I think i have a little bug report. After the installation of RWEnhancer 2 i can’t turn off Procedural Flora in TS. I thi k RWe2 overwrites the setting. If that is the case, then an option to turn it off in RWe2 would be nice.

Same thing with adaptive Bloom.

If you are having performance issues try this: I found out that making an exception in windows antivurus for RWEnhancer2.exe AND the folder that the program is in, makes quite a difference for performance.

DonMattheo That is a matter of preference. I am not asking for the functions you prefer to be removed. I am asking for a feature (along with the choice to costumise the hud/tasklist to anyones personal liking) to be added.

For me personally, i’d prefer not to have the rolling trackinspector at all, but to have it integrated in the tasklist. That is closer to how reality works. And i don’t want to be shown the aspect of the next signal either. That is not how German railways work. Nor do i want to see if the next speed allowance is more or less. Ebulas do not show that either. They show what the allowed speed is in the next section. Not if it’s more or less.

So i request that i can choose not to have that displayed. Not to have it removed!

And with a choice, you can have it your way, and i can have it mine. So don’t even see how arguing that my suggestion should not be taken into consideration will benefit anyone, to be honest.

After all, a program that offers costumisation, should give just that. Choices

oldsnake i think this days update fixed the “simulation paused” thing

nicolas83  oldsnake This was basically what i was suggesting too. If displayed on the same list as tasks, it would be a very basic ebula.

Edit. An option to have set how many tasks should appear in the tasklist would be awesome. Meaning if i wanted the 10 next tasks shown, i could set the value to 10.

oldsnake Yes even with 1000ms setting.

And don’t worry. The program is still in it’s early phase, so we have patience Right now i guess we are all on a journey towards a 1.0 version together.